Maryland Defends Privacy
of
Parking Ticket Records
By JUSTIN OPPELAAR
Capital News Service
October 7, 1997
ANNAPOLIS - The Maryland Court of Appeals
Tuesday sought to determine whether the
University of Maryland's records of
on-campus parking violations should be
made public like law enforcement records
or kept private like educational data.The
court heard arguments on both sides of
the issue during an appeal by the
Maryland attorney general's office of a
Prince George's County Circuit Court
ruling that The Diamondback, a campus
newspaper, be given access to the
records.
The university seeks to keep private
parking ticket information and some other
forms of student records.
The Diamondback took the school to
court to obtain records of parking
violations by members of the Maryland
basketball team and its coach. The paper
also wanted to see correspondence between
the university and the National
Collegiate Athletic Association about the
suspension of basketball player Duane
Simpkins.
Simpkins was benched for three games
during his senior season after taking a
loan from a former coach to help pay
$8,000 in parking fines.
Assistant Attorney General Dawna Cobb
argued that the records are not law
enforcement information, and therefore
are subject to privacy protection under
the Federal Family Education Rights and
Privacy Act of 1974.
Cobb said that the university
maintains its own system for enforcing
on-campus rules on everything from
parking tickets to sexual assault, and
therefore is not part of the state legal
system.
The school set up its system in part
to address the unique nature of on-campus
offenders, for whom privacy is a
particularly important issue, she said.
"Students at college are
vulnerable people at a vulnerable time of
life," she said. They "have an
expectation that their records will be
considered private."
Judge Alan Wilner countered that the
federal privacy act was intended to make
more information available to students
and their families, not to keep records
from the press or the public.
"The policy that Congress has
chosen is not to prohibit schools from
giving out that type of
information," he said.
Lee Levine, an attorney for The
Diamondback, added that, because the
University's authority to enforce parking
regulations comes from the state, it
falls into the "law
enforcement" category.
Parking records therefore should be
made public under the Maryland Public
Information Act.
"The only way a law enforcement
record loses its status as such is if it
is used exclusively for a non-law
enforcement purpose," which is not
the case with Maryland's ticketing
records, he said.
Levine added that the default judgment
under the state public information law is
to make records public, not to keep them
under wraps.
"The Maryland Legislature...said
that, when in doubt, you construe in a
manner consistent with the purpose of the
act, which is disclosure," he said.
The court also grappled with the issue
of whether correspondence with the NCAA
can be construed as part of the school's
"educational records," which
Cobb said are exempted from disclosure
under federal law.
"These records are education
records because they relate to a student
and are maintained by the university for
purposes of compliance with NCAA
eligibility rules," read the brief
filed by the attorney general's office.
Judge Howard S. Chasanow responded
that the university's own relationship
with the athletic association may cause
conflicts under the federal privacy act.
"Isn't giving out records to the
NCAA just as much a violation of FERPA as
giving them to the press?" he asked.
Finally, Levine requested that the
court reconsider the circuit court's
ruling to deny The Diamondback
compensation for legal fees.
Levine said afterward that he was
encouraged by the judges' reaction.
"I was happy that Judge Wilner
made the point during the rebutta that
the trial judge had not indicated reasons
for attorneys' fees," he said.
Cobb said she wasn't surprised by the
thorough interrogation she received by
the judges, given the complexity of the
federal and state laws involved in the
case.
"I got exactly what I
expected," she joked.
Levine wasn't sure how the judges
would rule, but maintained a cautiously
ambitious attitude.
"The bench didn't tip its
hand," he said, but "I am
hopeful."

|